It remains unclear when exactly the country’s gatekeepers will announce the fate of the Dalai Lama’s visa application. Speaking to iMaverick on Tuesday, Dirco spokesman Clayson Monyela stressed that the visa applicant, and not the media, will be notified about the success or failure of the application at some point in the next few days. Dirco claims that the visa application is subject to “due processes” but Al-Jazeera reported on Tuesday that a visa application at the South African High Commission in New Delhi, where the application was launched, usually takes five days. The delay has captured the attention of the world’s media and invited scrutiny of the South African government’s relationship with China.

The last time a brouhaha erupted over a purportedly failed visa application by the Tibetan spiritual leader, Inkatha Freedom Party leader Mangosuthu Buthelezi submitted an application at the Western Cape High Court to force the Home Affairs minister of the time, Nosiviwe Mapisa-Ngakula, the Home Affairs director-general Mavuso Msimang and President Kgalema Motlanthe, to grant the Dalai Lama a visa to enter South Africa. “On the basis of my experience and expertise as the longest serving minister of home affairs of the democratic South Africa, I can attest that the barring of the entry of a high-profile international political and spiritual leader, such as the Dalai Lama, is an exclusively political decision, as there are no grounds in law to bar him from entry,” Buthelezi said.

In response to Buthelezi however, on behalf of Home Affairs, Msimang said Buthelezi”s application was “replete with uncorroborated hearsay evidence”. In an affidavit Msimang said that the Dalai Lama had never actually applied for a visa to attend the peace conference in 2009. “It is denied that a visa application was submitted to the Department of Home Affairs for the issuing of a visa to His Holiness, the Dalai Lama,” the affidavit said. Msimang’s claim was corroborated by Themba Mgabe, a Home Affairs official based at the South African High Commission in India, who also said in an affidavit that he had met a representative of the Dalai Lama, but that the leader had decided to put a hold on applying for a visa pending talks over the postponement of the conference.

The Dalai Lama, however, confirmed to international media at the time that South Africa had denied a visa to the Tibetan monk. “It is true that South Africa, under slotsies.com intense pressure from the Chinese authorities, have denied a visa to the Dalai Lama,” spokesman Thubten Samphel said in 2009. Regardless of the official South African version of events, the records continue to show that South Africa caved under pressure from China in 2009 and denied the Dalai Lama a visa.

Two years later, Dirco revokes claims that South Africa had denied a visa to the Dalai Lama in 2009 and shrugs off rampant suspicion of Chinese meddling in the visa application. Crucially however, the banalities of visa applications are more commonly the realm of the Department of Home Affairs. It is, after all, Home Affairs that will ultimately grant, or deny the visa. Yet it has fallen to Dirco to answer questions about the visa application.

Spokesman for the Department of Home Affairs, Ronnie Mamoepa told iMaverick that due to the “magnitude” of the situation pending on the application, the matter has been referred to Dirco to handle. Mamoepa said the visa application had “political and diplomatic implications” and was therefore a Dirco matter. So while the South African government may claim that it is business as usual with the Dalai Lama’s visa application, the implications of the application are clearly understood. As we said some days ago, South Africa”s integrity test beckons.

Source: http://dailymaverick.co.za/

The Philippines has responded to this call for justice in many ways – building public awareness to stop the atoledo trafficking persons before it begins, establishing shelters for the victims, and prosecuting the criminals involved. The Supreme Court of the Philippines has helped lead the way. The Court has prioritized and expedited trafficking cases, helping to protect the most vulnerable and strengthening the rule of law by ensuring that these important cases are not lost under the heavy workload that the courts must manage.

The practical, hands-on approach you are taking today helps ensure a harmonized approach by the courts of the Philippines. This case analysis and template refinement will set a clear standard for trial courts and help to provide consistency across the country. Establishing clear expectations will also help prosecutors achieve lawful convictions.

It is common to talk about international best practices in efforts to combat crime; I think your approach today really is a model for other countries around the world to follow. For that, I thank you all.

REMARKS BY AMBASSADOR HARRY K. THOMAS, JR. AT THE ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION ON COMBATING HUMAN TRAFFICKING IN THE PHILIPPINES FOR JUSTICES OF THE APPELLATE COURT, MANILA, SEPTEMBER 22, 2011.

In particular, one widespread Diversity Visa (DV) scam e-mail instructs recipients to send money via Western Union to a fictitious person at the U.S. Embassy in London. If you have received this e-mail, you have been targeted by con artists. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES should money be sent to any address for participation in the DV Lottery. The Department of State”s Kentucky Consular Center (KCC) does not send e-mail notification to DV entrants Clearly Money which credit card is best comes with a liability to pay and ‘ordinary’ money does not. informing them of their winning entries. DV-2012 applicants will never receive correspondence containing information on an applicant”s status, but casino will only receive notification directing them to check their status on the official website. The Le logiciel de notre casino en ligne vous offre plus de 480 jeux de casino ultramodernes style Las Vegas. only official way to receive status updates is through the DV program website at www.dvlottery.state.gov.

Many private websites offer legitimate services to assist individuals in applying for visas, but some illegitimate entities claim to provide “visa services” as a cover for scams or identity theft. Some of these websites may attempt to charge a fee for providing forms and information about immigration procedures that are available to the public at no charge on the Department of State (www.state.gov) and travel.state.gov websites, or through the U.S. Embassy Manila website at http://manila.usembassy.gov.

More information can be read here.